Keyserver spam example

John Clizbe John at
Fri Jun 11 18:18:05 CEST 2010

Mark H. Wood wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 05:57:50PM +0200, Joke de Buhr wrote:
>> You do not sacrifice legitimate incoming mail because there is an RFC that 
>> clearly states mailservers do not operate from dynamic IP addresses. Therefore 
>> they can not be considered valid.
> If there is such an RFC, it's rubbish; I run an MTA at home on my
> dynamic address, and it works just fine, and is quite valid.

EXACTLY what Mark said, "RUBBISH"

MTA and keyserver here. My home ISP "blesses" me with a new address about once
every six months. Router automagically updates my DNS provider and everything is
good to go.

Cite the RFC, please.

John P. Clizbe                      Inet:John (a)
You can't spell fiasco without SCO. hkp://  or
     mailto:pgp-public-keys at

Q:"Just how do the residents of Haiku, Hawai'i hold conversations?"
A:"An odd melody / island voices on the winds / surplus of vowels"

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 499 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: </pipermail/attachments/20100611/db352516/attachment.pgp>

More information about the Gnupg-users mailing list