[OT] Re: Test mail to gnupg.user

[MFPA]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

Hi


On Sunday 13 June 2010 at 10:03:00 AM, in
<mid:201006131103.01318 at thufir.ingo-kloecker.de>, Ingo Klöcker wrote:


> IMNSHO, it's not up to the mailing list admins to
> dictate where replies to my posts should go. Therefore,
> the mailing list software should not touch the Reply-to
> header.

As far as I know, this is the only list I have ever subscribed to that
does not set a reply-to header to the list address. I'm not saying it
is "right" or "wrong," just unique in my experience.

The admins don't "dictate" where replies go: the person replying does
whatever they want. However, I would suggest that it *is* perfectly
proper for the admins of any list to set headers that encourage
posters (or their email software) to follow the etiquette of that
group. In the case of GnuPG-users, that would perhaps be a reply-to
header containing both the list address and the senders address.

- --
Best regards

MFPA                    mailto:expires2010 at ymail.com

Did you hear? They took the word gullible out of the dictionary
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQCVAwUBTBTeEaipC46tDG5pAQovlgP/ZM6sSGaX9gb+rm042SK23IRop39EmN/D
JR7dhdPQ0yZRIIERldohuyaSz3wIwVXBs23AG156RABojALXAIAfcjAoc9oo1dII
zcGhHNVIuXOYFJNt9cViuMnQ6ztk24rX0MiX7sOTBk6LF/pNsM3UPbCTSFqoGx3V
Bq9QwGjaBnM=
=AcRB
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----