Confirmation for cached passphrases useful?
jrollins at finestructure.net
Sat Oct 16 01:26:14 CEST 2010
On Sat, 16 Oct 2010 01:05:11 +0200, Hauke Laging <mailinglisten at hauke-laging.de> wrote:
> I just don't like the idea that access to the agent is "not noticed by
I strongly agree with this point. Let's think about it another way:
what if the user is themselves doing something that is unintentionally
accessing the key? They might prefer to know about it rather than have
it accessed without their knowledge. I would say that's good enough
reason to have confirmation right there.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 835 bytes
Desc: not available
More information about the Gnupg-users