PGP/MIME considered harmful for mobile
ben at adversary.org
Sun Feb 27 08:44:26 CET 2011
On 27/02/11 3:28 PM, Doug Barton wrote:
> If you look at the characteristics of the actual messages encrypted
> mail is very similar whether it's in-line or MIME.
Exactly, the encrypted output in both methods uses base-64 encoding.
> It's signed messages that make things interesting because the
> signature in a MIME message is actually (sort of) an attachment but
> also sort of not, which is why it confuses simple mail readers like
> Outlook Express.
Lots of things confuse Outlook Express. As for attachments, at first
glance the body of a message appears to be an attachment to the
headers, which leads to all sorts of fun with munged mbox format
inboxes. Or it did when I last had to pay attention to such things.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 227 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
More information about the Gnupg-users