PGP/MIME considered harmful for mobile
Ben McGinnes
ben at adversary.org
Mon Feb 28 04:22:31 CET 2011
On 28/02/11 2:02 PM, David Shaw wrote:
>
> I'm not at all surprised that you had those results. A limited
> subset of people have support for OpenPGP signatures. A limited
> subset of those people actually verify signatures. A limited subset
> of those people actually pay attention to what those signatures say.
And a limited subset of those will actually speak up. ;)
Regards,
Ben
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 227 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: </pipermail/attachments/20110228/f0c41d34/attachment.pgp>
More information about the Gnupg-users
mailing list