PGP/MIME considered harmful for mobile

Ben McGinnes ben at adversary.org
Mon Feb 28 04:22:31 CET 2011


On 28/02/11 2:02 PM, David Shaw wrote:
> 
> I'm not at all surprised that you had those results.  A limited
> subset of people have support for OpenPGP signatures.  A limited
> subset of those people actually verify signatures.  A limited subset
> of those people actually pay attention to what those signatures say.

And a limited subset of those will actually speak up.  ;)


Regards,
Ben


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 227 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: </pipermail/attachments/20110228/f0c41d34/attachment.pgp>


More information about the Gnupg-users mailing list