timestamp notation @gnupg.org

[MFPA]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

Hi


On Thursday 16 June 2011 at 3:27:12 PM, in
<mid:201106161627.13391.mailinglisten at hauke-laging.de>, Hauke Laging
wrote:


> If anyone is not happy with the OpenPGP timestamp
> format (which I haven't noticed yet)

Then I refer you to two postings from Amano Corunga
Message-id <20110608153652.4F1508C074 at nym.dizum.nl> and
Message-id <20110616002944.974948C0D8 at nym.dizum.nl>
which refer to a requirement to be able to create signatures without
revealing (possibly sensitive) information about the signer's time
management.

- --
Best regards

MFPA                    mailto:expires2011 at ymail.com

Consistency is the last refuge of the unimaginative
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQE7BAEBCgClBQJN+8XgnhSAAAAAAEAAVXNpZ25pbmdfa2V5X0lEIHNpZ25pbmdf
a2V5X0ZpbmdlcnByaW50IEAgIE1hc3Rlcl9rZXlfRmluZ2VycHJpbnQgQThBOTBC
OEVBRDBDNkU2OSBCQTIzOUI0NjgxRjFFRjk1MThFNkJENDY0NDdFQ0EwMyBAIEJB
MjM5QjQ2ODFGMUVGOTUxOEU2QkQ0NjQ0N0VDQTAzAAoJEKipC46tDG5pgJ0D+wUD
Vn+ZB+btGFtkwnvdtDYjinZTRtHeq5Lsz9tW1DbT20VpJTZxQuj0+Jo6KY8hOP8X
e4YHs/Z+ZAZHhBvbe1LMRnlp+izFrIBYfyEYH+chZj0QWGfX+Bt0uQlBrH9OZZEN
WKs+o7qmHpnFu9Vw3Uz7z4fpogvFPtpBaWyupXf1
=hYzo
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----