Is the OpenPGP model still useful?
BruderB at cation.de
Mon May 2 19:27:56 CEST 2011
Jeffrey Walton schrieb:
> On Mon, May 2, 2011 at 5:34 AM, B <BruderB at cation.de> wrote:
>> Simon Ward schrieb:
>>> On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 09:05:35PM +0200, B wrote:
>>>> By the way: Using OpenPGP with enigmail in Thunderbird, I miss a feature:
>>>> Usually the recipient rules work but if they fail (perhaps due to
>>>> background update of Thunderbird and not working plugin), I would like
>>>> to have a chance to see that the written message is going to be send
>>>> unencrypted BEFORE sending. Or vice vera: I want to see that a instantly
>>>> written message is going to be encrypted....
>>> There is an option in Enigmail's expert settings to always confirm.
>> But I'm lacking phantasy of how to use this for preventing me of sending
>> unencrypted in case that Enigmail does not work properly....
> If you run your mail server, you should be able to set up a secure
> channel by having your MTA issue a STARTTLS command. The communication
> from the originating MTA to your MTA will be secure (some hand
> waiving). If the sender connects to his/her mail server securely (and
> MTA's use TLS), then most opportunities for message inspection and
> tampering should be remediated.
thanks for your comment!
Your explanation has nothing to do with OpenPGP. Of course everybody
could or should use TLS against his server....
More information about the Gnupg-users