Gnupg-users Digest, Vol 111, Issue 2
Hauke Laging
mailinglisten at hauke-laging.de
Mon Dec 3 12:53:40 CET 2012
Am So 02.12.2012, 21:59:11 schrieb Len Cooley:
> But, these are old keys. I should probably create new ones. Is
> there any good reason I should keep my old decryption keys?
What do you mean by keep? Not to delete the private keys?
If you have not needed these keys for years then it is improbable that you
will need them in the future. But the other way round: Is there any good
reason to delete private keys which have been used?
You should (if you haven't done so yet) create and publish revocation
certificates for the oly keys stating that you have a new key (mentioning the
new key ID at best).
Hauke
--
☺
PGP: 7D82 FB9F D25A 2CE4 5241 6C37 BF4B 8EEF 1A57 1DF5 (seit 2012-11-04)
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 572 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: </pipermail/attachments/20121203/ccbee8c9/attachment.pgp>
More information about the Gnupg-users
mailing list