Using the not-dash-escaped option
remco at webconquest.com
Wed Feb 1 06:20:46 CET 2012
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 09:41:16PM +0000, MFPA wrote in
<516876184.20120131214116 at my_localhost>:
>> That's exactly what the --not-dash-escaped option is
>> for. Granted, it's not portable to some other PGP
>> implemetations, but if there is any mailing list in
>> world in which it would be acceptable, I would think
>> it would be this one! :)
>I'm guessing that's what you did, and the cut mark was not munged.
>Trying the same right back at ya.
>Are you sure this is what the option is for? The man page says it is
>to enable cleartext signatures to be used with patch files.
And for what it's worth... my client tells me the signature on this
particular post you made is invalid. Your other posts to this list all
pass the test ;-)
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
More information about the Gnupg-users