old vs new gnupg - encrypting files

Chris Clifton juice.qr at gmail.com
Wed Jul 25 19:47:26 CEST 2012


Got it, I will try that next. Thanks.

On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 1:16 PM, Hauke Laging <mailinglisten at hauke-laging.de
> wrote:

> Am Mi 25.07.2012, 12:48:57 schrieb Chris Clifton:
> > Forgive me, can you elaborate on 'encrypting the file to the other one
> and
> > your own key' ?
>
> You can give several recipients. The data is encrypted symmetrically (by
> AES
> e.g.) by a random key. This random key is asymmetrically encrypted to all
> recipients (or even to a passphrase). Thus an additional recipient
> increases
> the size of the resulting file slightly only.
>
> gpg --recipient 0x12345678 --recipient 0x87654321 --encrypt ./my/file
>
> See --encrypt-to.
>
> This way you can check whether you can decrypt the data yourself at least.
>
> Furthermore it would have been a lot more useful to get the full error
> message
> of your recipient instead of a simple "cannot".
>
>
> Hauke
> --
> PGP: D44C 6A5B 71B0 427C CED3 025C BD7D 6D27 ECCB 5814
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: </pipermail/attachments/20120725/093c5fb4/attachment.htm>


More information about the Gnupg-users mailing list