PGP interoperability

[Ben McGinnes]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

On 5/06/12 2:47 AM, Werner Koch wrote:
> On Mon,  4 Jun 2012 10:49, ben at adversary.org said:
> 
>> Was there any explanation of why the marketing people dropped or 
>> wanted to drop the functionality?
> 
> Maybe outdated technical specs which made it to the marketing
> dept. I don't know - you need to ask Symantec.

Fair enough.  Most people I correspond with use GPG, I'll worry about
it if I ever have trouble with someone encrypting to my El-Gamal key.


Regards,
Ben

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iEYEAREKAAYFAk/M7DgACgkQNxrFv6BK4xMSzQCfU/9j5BT30vntyY+gu4MTnT6a
P7AAn1C26VYQVxeeYnDrKLVYNF4N2Kxg
=ZucR
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----