ideal.dll // fixing thread breaking

Robert J. Hansen rjh at sixdemonbag.org
Fri Jun 29 19:39:22 CEST 2012


On 06/29/2012 12:00 PM, Steve wrote:
> not meaning to spark up new discussions about this issue (we've had that
> before). But I really think, the energy invested in this discussion
> would be better invested in writing mailman tweaks.

In the language of software engineering, this has moved from a defect to
fix to a lifecycle issue.  "Defect" is the stage where a bug is
reported: "fix" is the stage where the fix is available: "lifecycle" is
the often years-long process of getting the fix out to people who need it.

If I understand things correctly (and I may not be), Werner does not
host gnupg.org himself.  He rents a box in a colo facility for that, and
he's more or less stuck with whatever versions of software the provider
offers.  The provider hasn't offered an updated GNU Mailman, so
GnuPG-Users has this unfortunate situation where PGP/MIME doesn't
reliably work on it.

For what it's worth, my message left here as a correctly-signed PGP/MIME
message.  I received it back from the list as just 'signature.asc'.  A
(partial) diff of the two emails reveals:

>
> This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156)
> --===============1821215289==
12,13c61,62
<  protocol="application/pgp-signature";
<  boundary="------------enigBE03611A84F54D493777EBD6"
---
> 	protocol="application/pgp-signature";
> 	boundary="------------enigBE03611A84F54D493777EBD6"
71a121,135
>
>
> --===============1821215289==
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> Content-Disposition: inline
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gnupg-users mailing list
> Gnupg-users at gnupg.org
> http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users


That should hopefully make it clear exactly what the problem is.



More information about the Gnupg-users mailing list