A safe text editor // why??

[MFPA]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

Hi


On Monday 10 September 2012 at 9:46:13 PM, in
<mid:504E5195.20207 at gmail.com>, Landon Hurley wrote:



> If van eck phreaking is a potential surveillance
> vector, I think that we could categorically conclude
> that the person is screwed.


Is there any truth in the claim from some employers that having a
mobile phone switched on within about 3 metres of a computer monitor
allows the potential for remote compromise of the data on the screen
via the mobile phone network?

- --
Best regards

MFPA                    mailto:expires2012 at rocketmail.com

Zorba the Greek - before he zorbas you
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQCVAwUBUFD02aipC46tDG5pAQp2rAQAmsvZYrzQ3NTtHZDkyKhw3w/qSr8fOJCe
Rk2MaRUEOTxDIaRK308ZE2RtWlYFkaLnzbO/5Jthd2L4PKivIYqcs3Z2G2klcLmw
W/LdL8xXrl2VFSNynt8VRWOrAdt5Rv/9uhQuMrjnKkL3KshdnOIvkCGOGVUJKp9I
yZ4yY82ANho=
=FzvN
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----