"New" packet headers and gpg
Werner Koch
wk at gnupg.org
Fri Jan 4 21:23:45 CET 2013
On Fri, 4 Jan 2013 17:34, singpolyma at singpolyma.net said:
> headers. Such implementations' ouput can be read by gpg, but there's
> currently no way to convince gpg to talk to them :)
I just checked the RFC and it says:
If interoperability [with PGP 2] is not an issue, the new packet
format is RECOMMENDED.
Thus there is nothing in the standard which would speak against using
the new headers. This can either be done using a new option or by using
for example the existing compliance option --rfc4880.
I don't assume that PGP 2 is still in use. With the recent addition of
IDEA even decryption of old data can now be done with vanilla GPG.
Shall we give this a test by using one of the compliance options and
make the new headers the default in one or two years? Less code is
always better.
Salam-Shalom,
Werner
--
Die Gedanken sind frei. Ausnahmen regelt ein Bundesgesetz.
More information about the Gnupg-users
mailing list