The bug... More info.

[Werner Koch]

On Mon, 14 Apr 2014 20:42, cwal989 at comcast.net said:

> Are you the list owner?  Did you put a "subject line block" on this
> list?  If so, you should have said so, if not, then the list owner

There are only a few anti-spam measures on all gnupg.org lists and they
have been there for years.  Specific procmail fitering is:

  :0
  * ^Subject:.*=\?ks_c_5601-1987\?
  /dev/null
  
  :0
  * ^Subject:.*=\?GB2312\?
  /dev/null
  
  :0:
  * ^Subject: Delivery Status Notification
  /dev/null
  
  :0:
  * ^From:.*lottery.*
  spam
  
  :0
  * ^Content-Type:.*multipart/mixed
  {
      :0 B
      * ^Content-Type:.*text/plain;.*Windows-1252
      * ^Content-Type:.*application/octet-stream
      /dev/null
  }
  
# We don't accept ZIP or EXE file attachments.
  :0 BH
  * ? scrutmime --match-zip --match-exe  --quiet
  /dev/null
  
  :0:
  * ^Subject:[ ]=\?Windows-1251\?B\?
  /dev/null
  
  :0fw: spamassassin.lock
  | /usr/bin/spamassassin
  
  :0:
  * ^X-Spam-Flag: yes
  /dev/null


and there is also greylisting and an RBL at the receiving MX.

And my private filtering drops everything which has HTML inside; do I do
not see all posted mails.


Salam-Shalom,

   Werner

--  
Die Gedanken sind frei.  Ausnahmen regelt ein Bundesgesetz.