Fwd: GNU hackers discover HACIENDA government surveillance and give us a way to fight back

MFPA 2014-667rhzu3dc-lists-groups at riseup.net
Thu Aug 28 01:48:29 CEST 2014


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

Hi


On Wednesday 27 August 2014 at 8:37:10 PM, in
<mid:53FE3366.6010706 at sixdemonbag.org>, Robert J. Hansen wrote:


>> Is there really as much of a distinction as some would
>> have us  believe?

> Yes, absolutely.  If the problem is X and your advocacy
> loudly insists that Y is happening, then you're (a) not
> solving X (although Y might need fixing anyway), and
> (b) all the people you've persuaded to join your cause
> will desert you as soon as they discover you were
> totally uninformed.

A good point well made. The act of collecting metadata is distinct
from the act of collecting content.

But there will be significant overlap between the dataset collected by
somebody harvesting content and the inferences about somebody's life
that could be drawn by somebody harvesting metadata. I had hoped the
quote from the EFF website would illustrate this.


- --
Best regards

MFPA                    mailto:2014-667rhzu3dc-lists-groups at riseup.net

Don't be silly, it's all "make believe" anyway
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iPQEAQEKAF4FAlP+bl9XFIAAAAAALgAgaXNzdWVyLWZwckBub3RhdGlvbnMub3Bl
bnBncC5maWZ0aGhvcnNlbWFuLm5ldEJBMjM5QjQ2ODFGMUVGOTUxOEU2QkQ0NjQ0
N0VDQTAzAAoJEKipC46tDG5p9RIEAJQDY9Sam7o5hXGcGzMZ5gKKoss30cfC/DTU
pHiARmg6gurELF9hQKVDcYH6WP1SIEqQDjO/3J4hpTvAdv6ukIaWqbPyzmjoRLgG
jBQXlX7tsTCYEx0ylFg70rjNOUTe0r0S9dXUVWv2KUZff595OVfGzsVIE0Adz73p
fJ8cEg8Q
=g3iy
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----




More information about the Gnupg-users mailing list