Question Regarding Adding A New uid

MFPA 2014-667rhzu3dc-lists-groups at riseup.net
Tue Feb 11 13:58:01 CET 2014


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

Hi


On Monday 10 February 2014 at 7:03:21 PM, in
<mid:79b1d6852a6b452480c04984a2738004 at CO2PR07MB475.namprd07.prod.outlook.com>,
Jim Ernst wrote:


> I have a process built that will read the uid as
> -local-user in order to determine which key to utilize
> in an extract process. I am adding a second uid to the
> key as part of the changes. I have given the current
> key set (without the new uid) to the server that is the
> target. Since this new uid is only to be used on the
> source side to determine which key to use, is it
> necessary to publish the key a second time to the
> target server once I have added the new uid ? I am
> figuring the uid is more of a name by which I can
> reference the key and I would not need to send the key
> again to the target server.

If the information will not be used at the other end, sending it adds
nothing. It also causes no harm.


- --
Best regards

MFPA                    mailto:2014-667rhzu3dc-lists-groups at riseup.net

A closed mouth gathers no foot
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iPQEAQEKAF4FAlL6Hn5XFIAAAAAALgAgaXNzdWVyLWZwckBub3RhdGlvbnMub3Bl
bnBncC5maWZ0aGhvcnNlbWFuLm5ldEJBMjM5QjQ2ODFGMUVGOTUxOEU2QkQ0NjQ0
N0VDQTAzAAoJEKipC46tDG5pbagD/jg4/F1ZrJdQYtGZB/py6UDWCdcXkHgR8rPV
8gOZ45iOXzuXJBQjfbbC4Q9XqBHiLZev6f/L2nvd9BLYSSic/mJXEWS4eyqcnL+H
TrWkvW5/5EIwz9cyqeUyyqCgWQgEzGDmNDLL2BjiAqRrrS24PFVr+0PvRSoho3NF
uYcUoiTh
=cOIX
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----




More information about the Gnupg-users mailing list