sign encrypted emails

[Robert J. Hansen]

> That is neither trivial nor reliable nor the best approach to deliver 
> this information.

It is a trivial fix; whether it is reliable depends on how committed
participants are towards enforcing policy.

> As I said in my first mail in this thread this isn't about changing 
> GnuPG at all because 

Then why are we talking about this?

> As I also said the reason why I have asked this here is the availability 
> of people who can make useful comments on that (and are probably 
> interested in such general discussions).

You are receiving useful comments.  You are choosing to disregard them.  :)


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 455 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: </pipermail/attachments/20140105/38689a65/attachment.sig>