one key/pair for multiple email accounts

Kristian Fiskerstrand kristian.fiskerstrand at sumptuouscapital.com
Tue Jul 8 10:54:18 CEST 2014


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

On 07/08/2014 10:44 AM, The Fuzzy Whirlpool Thunderstorm wrote:
>> in practice, do users of gnupg find that having multiple email
>> account id's +added to one key/pair using that key/pair to sign
>> and/or encrypt emails & files +more efficient to manage?
>> 
>> 
>> i have mulitple email accounts and in the past had generated a 
>> key/pair for +each, each with its own unique passphrase. i'm
>> rethinking that approach.
>> 
>> curious how other uses in this situation manage their gnupg?
> 
> This depends on your situation. If you want to be identified as one
> single person for all mails, you are better use one key id and add
> each mail address to your primary key as additional identities. If
> you want to hide your real identity by having multiple email 
> addresses, you may create a separate identity key for each mail
> address. That's what I thought.

Wouldn't necessarily be to _hide_ anything either. I tend to use it as
a role-based approach, e.g. I have an own key for my work address
(that is barely used at all, but it _is_ available). The primary
reason for this is that I have that key located on the company
computer which is under the control of the IT department, not me, so
wouldn't want to use my own personal keys for that.


- -- 
- ----------------------------
Kristian Fiskerstrand
Blog: http://blog.sumptuouscapital.com
Twitter: @krifisk
- ----------------------------
Public PGP key 0xE3EDFAE3 at hkp://pool.sks-keyservers.net
fpr:94CB AFDD 3034 5109 5618 35AA 0B7F 8B60 E3ED FAE3
- ----------------------------
Carpe noctem
Seize the night
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=0yX4
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



More information about the Gnupg-users mailing list