peter at digitalbrains.com
Thu Oct 16 19:52:35 CEST 2014
On 15/10/14 23:45, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote:
> There *are* simply solutions to this rather trivial and common
I don't consider that a trivial problem, actually. I can think of
many threat models where it is entirely non-trivial. You never mentioned
a threat model.
> OK. Swell. Ignoring, for the moment, the personal condescension
> implicit in your comments
There was no condescension in there; none at all whatsoever. I don't
consider myself knowledgeable enough to write such an implementation.
And I'm not condescending towards myself.
I'm sorry that you felt it that way; if I had ever considered that you
might find it condescending I would have included a disclaimer. However,
I thought the following two quotes together already made it clear that
it was no condescension.
>From the release announcement:
> Thorough understanding of applied cryptography is required for proper
> use Libgcrypt.
>From your own words:
> [...] even though I am by no means knowledgable about cryptography
> generally. (Most of what little I do know has been garnered from
> with Wikipedia.)
> Was that promise just inserted into the manual as some sort of cruel
> joke, you know, to get naive people like me to waste a lot of time
> looking for examples that aren't even actually in there?
<Sigh>. If this is how you wish this conversation to go, I don't feel
like helping. When we start out assuming bad faith on everything that in
some completely unlikely scenario could possibly be bad faith, then I am
done with this.
You have my apologies for writing something you misread as
condescending. Other than that, I'm done here.
I use the GNU Privacy Guard (GnuPG) in combination with Enigmail.
You can send me encrypted mail if you want some privacy.
My key is available at <http://digitalbrains.com/2012/openpgp-key-peter>
More information about the Gnupg-users