Notes from the first OpenPGP Summit

[Daniel Kahn Gillmor]

On Tue 2015-04-28 11:36:34 -0400, Robert J. Hansen wrote:
> I'm not objecting to the idea of GKD providing its own pinentry:
> creating a gkd-pinentry sounds like a good idea.

OK, that's good!

> I'm objecting to what I read (and possibly misread) as placing GKD hooks
> into the *GnuPG-distributed* pinentry.
>
> I would suggest that in the future we talk about "pinentry" only for
> GnuPG's pinentry, and "foo-pinentry" to denote a pinentry provided by
> foo, so as to prevent future misunderstandings.  :)

Well, gnupg currently distributes four different pinentries:

 pinentry-gtk2
 pinentry-qt4
 pinentry-curses
 pinentry-tty

:)  I'm assuming that Neal is adding this hook to pinentry-gtk2, and not
to the others, but i haven't checked.

BTW: thanks, Neal!

     --dkg