MIME or inline signature ?

[MFPA]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

Hi


On Friday 13 February 2015 at 1:14:25 PM, in
<mid:20150213081425.7a418830 at scorpio>, Jerry wrote:


> On Fri, 13 Feb 2015 12:22:23 +0000, MFPA stated:

>> My preference is Inline: I want everything right there
>> in the message body where I can see it.

> Exactly what is it you feel the over powering urge to
> see?

If the message text is covered by a signature, I want to see the
signature. I would not accept a cheque where the signature was on an
attached document instead of on the cheque.

With PGP/MIME, even the message text itself is shifted out of the
message body into an attachment.

- --
Best regards

MFPA                    mailto:2014-667rhzu3dc-lists-groups at riseup.net

Hard work never killed anyone, but why take a risk?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQF8BAEBCgBmBQJU314nXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w
ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXRCM0FFN0VDQTlBOEM4QjMwMjZBNUEwRjU2
QjdDNzRDRUIzMUYyNUYwAAoJEGt8dM6zHyXwh5oH/1NmieM87eLK35VwTv0g8S0g
uSVc9JQNVuY9Q5n2srASTQevlSYOjvXVE9NwHr2yYsmRcSTCoyDDa9mPcN+hPySV
4NK6V5YG8kDTV2zu8PyCbDHtpo67o4Dlxn3bDorm2FcqiH1YPRpeIrqIiJXquFO0
caWDQ/p2KtL8kE7X0YhPoGO5l7wco0Eg6zHkos3CY5EXEuYyo96bgu7MM0/Mep3z
BP6AhV8AdsWzTmswYWPlkxR8WTq9evqAFUTYrlIQiFooscQxjo0u/i39WvLppi0D
XHnU/rAAfdoE9a4YuZbKcM+rzHEcvLdbeSz52W37rpKAg/E24zA+fPs4yla6BfOI
vgQBFgoAZgUCVN9eKF8UgAAAAAAuAChpc3N1ZXItZnByQG5vdGF0aW9ucy5vcGVu
cGdwLmZpZnRoaG9yc2VtYW4ubmV0MzNBQ0VENEVFOTEzNEVFQkRFNkE4NTA2MTcx
MkJDNDYxQUY3NzhFNAAKCRAXErxGGvd45CWeAQCEGMx0i8PTcx/lpqckRlY5fcH7
Akr0W5ztxcBy1A9k9AEA4qdTdFK8RKcUsS0kZvJkQbsFm4kSe+oxu8uz9WsE4AA=
=D3XT
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----