MIME or inline signature ?

MFPA 2014-667rhzu3dc-lists-groups at riseup.net
Mon Feb 16 04:25:11 CET 2015


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512



On Sunday 15 February 2015 at 4:25:56 PM, in
<mid:54E0C894.8080404 at hammernoch.net>, Ludwig Hügelschäfer wrote:


> The only place to get trust to the senders key (i.e. to
> make it "valid" for you) is to meet the key owner in
> real life, verify the identity documents, his
> fingerprint and mail addresses and sign his key if
> everything is ok. There's no measure to replace this
> procedure.

There is the Web of Trust. Or you used to be able to use a Thawte
Notary or similar. Or maybe even a CA. All of which would be overkill
for signatures on a mailing list.


- --
Best regards

MFPA                    mailto:2014-667rhzu3dc-lists-groups at riseup.net

James, while John had had 'had', had had 'had had'.
'Had had' had had a better effect on the teacher.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=
=/DFc
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----




More information about the Gnupg-users mailing list