MIME or inline signature ?

[Antony Prince]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 2/16/2015 12:39 PM, Stephan Beck wrote:
> Hi, Christopher,
> 
> Am 16.02.2015 um 13:01 schrieb Christopher Beck:
>> 
> 
>> 
>>> Hi,
>> 
>>> now I'll use the inline format. If you can now verify my
>>> signature, this still could be the same bug (or whatever it
>>> is...).
>> 
>> Ah sorry, the previous mail still was MIME. Now it's inline.
> 
> 
> 
> The signature of this (inline) message was automatically marked as
> correct by Enigmail, whereas the PGP/MIME tend to give a failure,
> at least, that's what it looks like at first glance. I will check
> my Enigmail settings, maybe there's something wrong with them.
> 
> Thanks
> 
> Stephan
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing
> list Gnupg-users at gnupg.org 
> http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
> 

I'm getting the same results with Thunderbird/Enigmail. Christopher's
MIME signature fails to verify("BAD signature"), but the inline
signature verifies just fine "UNTRUSTED Good signature from
Christopher Beck". Just wanted to confirm that I was getting the same
results.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJU4kXlAAoJEKbhYkJPBAdEVlgIAL0dXKBFPxiQy+75mrezC/Rb
YWTKh83Qopj5YebHBVsOtKhs3N++gHgc36lcAHxC9o5pU3WnpWqoZFHj367ACabu
sRU3ilCnvQYXGKTHWeNzezDckGYe5orYAggyg2iLA7GK8Bh2t2o+G7OK3kCbDe0U
H6zU1nsP2iUNUuyVnThftoUsmAcurSr72SWzT4DqX4Uoak3bg2ArUzwqBNeEruD+
6MvZWLrYcl8UMcAbAENGC05kJdKKrPK+bLQmq8KmxbzUj5Brzdz9b959HjFCBXxi
P/wU58jUIIQAhLhRyEErJvgQ8bN66OhF7TKHdM7WacZOGJ9AYaSrw4Ua0roDxeE=
=2zWd
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----