The praise of GnuPG @31C3

Doug Barton dougb at
Thu Jan 1 00:33:46 CET 2015

On 12/31/2014 3:25 PM, mark hellewell wrote:
> And the “ssh is broken” remark strikes me as a little dramatic, too.

Well I've seen vague references to some of the "less secure" settings 
being vulnerable, but I've yet to see, "everything below this line is 
vulnerable, everything above this line is thought to be safe."

If anyone has a reference ...


More information about the Gnupg-users mailing list