Key generation, subkeys and improved documentation

MFPA 2014-667rhzu3dc-lists-groups at riseup.net
Wed Jan 7 03:30:55 CET 2015


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

Hi


On Monday 5 January 2015 at 10:46:54 PM, in
<mid:4F6CE41D-0A52-42B8-A413-159F3505E204 at yahoo.com>, Nex6|Bill wrote:



> But I have seen some of the more
> paranoid privacy folks doing 4096 key pairs.

I'm sure I have even seen discussions about 16384-bit. I seem to
recall somebody posting where the code would need changing to allow
this, but cautioning such a key would be unusable by virtually
everybody else.



- --
Best regards

MFPA                    mailto:2014-667rhzu3dc-lists-groups at riseup.net

She looked like butter wouldn't melt in her mouth - or anywhere else.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=
=Xn7S
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----




More information about the Gnupg-users mailing list