A forgotten patch?
bernhard at intevation.de
Mon Mar 2 12:32:40 CET 2015
On Sunday 01 March 2015 at 20:11:10, Werner Koch wrote:
> > was a bug report for the patch? I would gladly write one if that would
> Well written bug reports are always appreciated.
I believe the main thing that Werner is mentioning here is that
analysis of an unwanted situation and a fix are two different things.
Having a reproducable problem report is very valuable and may be
easier to agree on as first step.
Then there are always several ways to improve the situation.
And naturally this may lead to a discussion about what is the best way
So if anyone find a problem with GnuPG - may it be a defect or a behaviour
that should be different - best is to get a reproducable behaviour reported
and get people to agree that it is a problem.
www.intevation.de/~bernhard (CEO) www.fsfe.org (Founding GA Member)
Intevation GmbH, Osnabrück, Germany; Amtsgericht Osnabrück, HRB 18998
Owned and run by Frank Koormann, Bernhard Reiter, Dr. Jan-Oliver Wagner
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 473 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
More information about the Gnupg-users