[Enigmail] Popescu and keys

Ben McGinnes ben at adversary.org
Fri May 22 09:26:51 CEST 2015

On 22/05/2015 5:00 pm, Werner Koch wrote:
> On Thu, 21 May 2015 23:58, ben at adversary.org said:
>> Is it possible that a keyserver running the old, buggy PKS code
>> (v. 0.9.something) mangled these keys?
> Yes, but that won't explain why the key binding signature is valid.

Okay, there's clearly some deeply weird stuff happening with those
keys, or rather, has happened to them.

Has anyone identified the pattern in the screenshots at the top of the
list of ~160-170 UIDs?


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 630 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: </pipermail/attachments/20150522/7ae21792/attachment.sig>

More information about the Gnupg-users mailing list