FAQ: drop mention of 1.4?

[Werner Koch]

On Mon, 31 Aug 2015 19:45, johanw at vulcan.xs4all.nl said:

> Less complex by introducing communication issues between all separate
> parts? We clearly have a different idea of complexity. Separartion of

So be it.

> tasks does not automatically mean separate binaries. That used to be the
> Unix philosophy (there is systemd, but that's another discussion) but on

Its old but its good.

> Just see how many issues there are with pinentry on this list.

You may want to reread the discussions to see that the cause for this
was other software making improper use of GnuPG and Pinentry.


Salam-Shalom,

   Werner

-- 
Die Gedanken sind frei.  Ausnahmen regelt ein Bundesgesetz.