wk at gnupg.org
Thu Apr 28 20:33:07 CEST 2016
On Wed, 27 Apr 2016 11:31, peter at digitalbrains.com said:
> Yes, I think it would be better if stuff like GPGME, libassuan,
> libgcrypt, libgpg-error, libksba and pinentry got their own category on
> the website rather than being a peer to the other stuff in related
I changed this library page a bit to better address your issues.
> While "related software" is a large list, I don't think it's meant to be
> exhaustive. I'm also not sure what the qualifications are to be
> considered for being added (other than being free software). I think
> this is done informally, on an ad-hoc basis.
Right, just write or even better add a bug report (gpgweb/whish).
Die Gedanken sind frei. Ausnahmen regelt ein Bundesgesetz.
More information about the Gnupg-users