EasyGnuPG

[Dashamir Hoxha]

On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 6:48 PM, Daniel Kahn Gillmor <dkg at fifthhorseman.net>
wrote:
>
> > In this case, "gpgme-tool" should be packaged on its own, not inside the
> > package "*libgpgme11-dev*".
> > I am refering to this message:
> > https://lists.gnupg.org/pipermail/gnupg-devel/2014-December/029206.html
>
> I'm entirely open to packaging gpgme-tool separately from the -dev
> package, if there is a clear and compelling argument for it.
>

If I write a tool that uses and depends on `gpgme-tool`, it doesn't seem
right to me to depend on a -dev package. This is just a feeling, maybe I am
wrong.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: </pipermail/attachments/20160323/f5104231/attachment.html>