Implications of a common private keys directory in 2.1

[MFPA]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512



On Wednesday 23 November 2016 at 3:48:19 AM, in
<mid:20161123034819.AD17F1032265 at remailer.paranoici.org>, Carola
Grunwald wrote:-


> This concept of an enhanced transport security layer
> offers external
> adversaries least possible information while it
> doesn't preclude the
> sender from adding another inner encryption/signature
> layer created with
> a key she herself controls.

> Hope that helps to understand what I'm aiming at.


Have you looked at all at Mike Ingle's "Confidant Mail" (CM)
<https://www.confidantmail.org>? Maybe your signing/encryption servers
at each end could incorporate a CM-to-SMTP gateway; CM could be
awesome it were possible to compose and read messages on an ordinary
mail client.



- --
Best regards

MFPA                  <mailto:2014-667rhzu3dc-lists-groups at riseup.net>

Penguins are not to be trusted, especially those who listen to organ music.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=
=biB1
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----