Confusion about a statement in the FAQ

Anthony Papillion anthony at cajuntechie.org
Sat Sep 10 23:19:28 CEST 2016


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

On 9/10/2016 4:00 PM, Robert J. Hansen wrote:
>> I'm confused by this. What does it mean? What does 'armor the
>> mail headers" mean? Is this the same as 'encrypting' the mail
>> headers or does it mean something else?
> 
> It means there's a way to cryptographically protect most (but not
> all) email headers, which foils many kinds of metadata analysis.
> 
> At present I don't think any email client supports this
> capability. However, it's planned for Enigmail and other clients,
> and it's a good reason to use PGP/MIME instead of inline.

Hmm, OK that's kind of what I thought. But I'm still a little
confused. Doesn't the email server have to support it? For example, if
I send an email to someone using Gmail, how does Gmail route it if the
headers are encrypted? Or would the "to" be one of those things not
encrypted?

Anthony



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=JGbA
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



More information about the Gnupg-users mailing list