Confusion about a statement in the FAQ
andrewg at andrewg.com
Tue Sep 13 13:07:46 CEST 2016
On 11/09/16 02:13, Robert J. Hansen wrote:
>> Whichever "they" you had in mind when you brought it up...? ;-)
> I said "Enigmail and other clients" -- if you don't specify which
> precise implementation you're interested in, I don't know which one you
> want to know about.
Well, I sort of wanted to know about them all, i.e. if there was an
emerging consensus. Not much use if all the MUAs do it differently. ;-)
>> memoryhole's readme (thanks for the link!) states that it has been
>> implemented in enigmail...
> There's limited support for it. I wouldn't say it's ready for prime
> time, but if you feel like living on the bleeding edge, go for it! :)
I've waited 20 years for it, no harm waiting a little longer for
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 801 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
More information about the Gnupg-users