Signatures on a subkey?

[Werner Koch]

On Sat, 14 Jan 2017 13:17, 2014-667rhzu3dc-lists-groups at riseup.net said:
> I was just looking at key 0x2B9880E1E6602099 because GnuPG was
> flagging up that the key is newer than some of the signatures on it. I
> noticed that a large number of the signatures visible with
> gpg --with-sig-list --list-keys 0x2B9880E1E6602099
> are not visible at the delsig command when editing the key. They are

I also noticed quite some misplaced signature on subkeys.  Those were
not handled by the clean sub-command or the import clean filter.  With
2.1.18 this was changed so that all wrong key binding signatures are
removed.


Shalom-Salam,

   Werner

-- 
Die Gedanken sind frei.  Ausnahmen regelt ein Bundesgesetz.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 227 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: </pipermail/attachments/20170202/96e038ce/attachment-0001.sig>