DRM?

[Andrew Gallagher]

On 16/01/18 17:19, Leo Gaspard wrote:
> “on 2018-04-01, please expose only the master key and its revocation
> certificate(s) to clients”

IF you wanted to go this route, it would be easier for keyservers to
only serve the master key + revocation cert for *all* cases where a
revocation cert exists. What does it matter who signed a key that has
been revoked, or what IDs it used to be tied to? It's dead, throw it away.

-- 
Andrew Gallagher

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 862 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <https://lists.gnupg.org/pipermail/gnupg-users/attachments/20180116/d8e24a4a/attachment.sig>