Subpacket 33 and GnuPG Specifics on RFC-4880 Tag ID's, algorithm identifiers, etc
Werner Koch
wk at gnupg.org
Thu Jan 25 09:13:28 CET 2018
On Thu, 25 Jan 2018 05:43, gnupg-users at gnupg.org said:
> After looking at the content of subpacket 33, it appears to be the signing-key's fingerprint prepended by '0x04'.
>
> So I'm guessing subpacket 33 is to be a more robust version of subpacket 16 (Issuer)?
Right. From RFC-4880bis (draft -03)
| 5.2.3.5. {5.2.3.5} Issuer
|
| (8-octet Key ID)
|
| The OpenPGP Key ID of the key issuing the signature. If the version
| of that key is greater than 4, this subpacket MUST NOT be included in
| the signature.
|
|
| 5.2.3.28. Issuer Fingerprint
|
| (1 octet key version number, N octets of fingerprint)
|
| The OpenPGP Key fingerprint of the key issuing the signature. This
| subpacket SHOULD be included in all signatures. If the version of
| the issuing key is 4 and an Issuer subpacket is also included in the
| signature, the key ID of the Issuer subpacket MUST match the low 64
| bits of the fingerprint.
|
| Note that the length N of the fingerprint for a version 4 key is 20
| octets; for a version 5 key N is 32.
Note that the OpenPGP WG page is not anymore updated automatically, thus
you better watch
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-openpgp-rfc4880bis/
for updates. I use
ssh://git@gitlab.com/openpgp-wg/rfc4880bis
to prepare new draft versions. With gpg implementing some propose
changes I guess I should do a -04 soonish. I will report also to
gnupg-devel whne tehre is a new draft.
Shalom-Salam,
Werner
--
Die Gedanken sind frei. Ausnahmen regelt ein Bundesgesetz.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 227 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.gnupg.org/pipermail/gnupg-users/attachments/20180125/9d61be23/attachment.sig>
More information about the Gnupg-users
mailing list