Slightly OT - i need the proper wording for a signed document

[Juergen BRUCKNER]

Hello Stefan, Hello all,

of course it is possible, that several people sign (and/or timestamp) a
document.
Just a example out of my business:
There is a contract to be signd by mor than 2 persons or parties. So i
make a document of it - for example a pdf file (which is recommended) -
and send it to the next person who has to sign it, this person signs and
send it to another person for signing ... and so on.
As long the document is not edited all signatures stay intact and valid.

This is necessary, as otherwise there never could be signed a contract
between 2 parties.

regards
Juergen

Am 03.11.18 um 17:21 schrieb Stefan Claas:
> On Sat, 3 Nov 2018 10:43:49 +0100, Stefan Claas wrote:
>> On Fri, 2 Nov 2018 15:42:40 +0100, Stefan Claas wrote:
> 
>>> I strongly assume that it is also possible that someone
>>> else can sign my .pdf too with a qualified signature and
>>> this will also not invalidate my qualified signature, unless
>>> of course someone would *edit* my document.  
>>
>> Just did a test with an older .pdf, which was signed with my
>> non-qualified D-Trust certificate and time stamped with
>> freetsa. Now i signed it again with my qualified D-Trust certificate
>> and time stamped again.
>>
>> Works perfect! :-)
> 
> Small update: A Usenet friend just signed my .pdf too, with his
> qualified D-Trust certificate and it works like expected. :-)
> 
> Regards
> Stefan
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Gnupg-users mailing list
> Gnupg-users at gnupg.org
> http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
> 

-- 
Juergen M. Bruckner
juergen at bruckner.tk

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 3894 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <https://lists.gnupg.org/pipermail/gnupg-users/attachments/20181103/fedaf6ca/attachment.bin>