Slightly OT - i need the proper wording for a signed document

[Stefan Claas]

Am 03.11.18 um 17:30 schrieb Juergen BRUCKNER:
> Hello Stefan, Hello all,
>
> of course it is possible, that several people sign (and/or timestamp) a
> document.
> Just a example out of my business:
> There is a contract to be signd by mor than 2 persons or parties. So i
> make a document of it - for example a pdf file (which is recommended) -
> and send it to the next person who has to sign it, this person signs and
> send it to another person for signing ... and so on.
> As long the document is not edited all signatures stay intact and valid.
>
> This is necessary, as otherwise there never could be signed a contract
> between 2 parties.
>
Hi Jürgen,

thanks for confirming and your explanation.

I must admit that this is all new to me.

I think this may be also a good thing if it would be accepted
by the PGP community, say if someone lost his/her GnuPG
revocation certificate and passphrase for his/her secret key
that one could sign a document too containing the key data
etc., like i proposed with my intial posting.

Regards
Stefan

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 3852 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <https://lists.gnupg.org/pipermail/gnupg-users/attachments/20181103/630954d2/attachment-0001.bin>