Newbie question.

[Ayoub Misherghi]

I understand it can be frustrating, especially if nobody has a deciding 
vote or Vito power or moderator power. Someone should have have veto 
power and anybody with other ideas can always fork and do his own thing. 
That way it may probably work. A tyrant can stay on course and others 
fork and be their own tyrant and are free to produce something better.


The moderators on this list (I do not know who they are) have been 
tyrannical excluding some of my posts; I am not bitter or resentful. I 
have to live up to standard and my posts have to be kind and gentle so 
as not to burden those trying to help me for free; and amenable to 
support by helping whoever is helping me. If there was no tyrant I could 
have caused nuisance. Documentation needs a tyrant too.


On 7/26/2020 12:01 PM, Robert J. Hansen wrote:
>> How about collective and cooperative effort in a wiki, or cloud funding
>> pledges or donations? Those who contribute (money or effort) get
>> privilege of some kind.
> I am very pessimistic about the idea of collective effort.  What
> experience has taught me from working on the FAQ is that a small number
> of people with extreme ideas speak up the loudest, and the vast majority
> of users who are calm and reasonable speak up barely at all.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gnupg-users mailing list
> Gnupg-users at gnupg.org
> http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users