monkeysign removal from bullseye
Michał Górny
mgorny at gentoo.org
Sun Mar 22 06:31:55 CET 2020
On Sat, 2020-03-21 at 23:39 +0000, Andrew Gallagher wrote:
> It would appear that the python2/3 migration dumpster fire has claimed
> yet another good package[1]:
>
> ```
> > Hi,
> > Has there been further development? Otherwise I'd suggest to remove
> monkeysign
> > for now, it's blocking the removal of pygtk (and in turn a few other
> libraries)
> > and it can still be re-introduced by bullseye release if it gets ported.
>
> i'm sorry to say there has been no progress and must now admit this is
> the only short term solution.
> ```
>
> I cannot stress enough how awesome monkeysign is. I have a pet project
> that is only reasonably possible because of its existence, and which I
> will have to abandon if monkeysign becomes unmaintained.
>
> How much work would be involved in getting it back into production? I'm
> not a python programmer (the python2/3 migration catastrophe has put me
> off ever wasting my brain cells on it) but I might be willing to suffer
> it for this one project.
>
Gentoo has removed it back in 2018. It says:
| Please use caff from app-crypt/signing-party instead.
Maybe that's an option for you as well.
--
Best regards,
Michał Górny
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 618 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <https://lists.gnupg.org/pipermail/gnupg-users/attachments/20200322/876ee1d5/attachment.sig>
More information about the Gnupg-users
mailing list