monkeysign removal from bullseye

Michał Górny mgorny at gentoo.org
Sun Mar 22 06:31:55 CET 2020


On Sat, 2020-03-21 at 23:39 +0000, Andrew Gallagher wrote:
> It would appear that the python2/3 migration dumpster fire has claimed
> yet another good package[1]:
> 
> ```
> > Hi,
> > Has there been further development? Otherwise I'd suggest to remove
> monkeysign
> > for now, it's blocking the removal of pygtk (and in turn a few other
> libraries)
> > and it can still be re-introduced by bullseye release if it gets ported.
> 
> i'm sorry to say there has been no progress and must now admit this is
> the only short term solution.
> ```
> 
> I cannot stress enough how awesome monkeysign is. I have a pet project
> that is only reasonably possible because of its existence, and which I
> will have to abandon if monkeysign becomes unmaintained.
> 
> How much work would be involved in getting it back into production? I'm
> not a python programmer (the python2/3 migration catastrophe has put me
> off ever wasting my brain cells on it) but I might be willing to suffer
> it for this one project.
> 

Gentoo has removed it back in 2018.  It says:

| Please use caff from app-crypt/signing-party instead.

Maybe that's an option for you as well.

-- 
Best regards,
Michał Górny

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 618 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <https://lists.gnupg.org/pipermail/gnupg-users/attachments/20200322/876ee1d5/attachment.sig>


More information about the Gnupg-users mailing list