Which keyserver

[Stefan Claas]

Robert J. Hansen wrote:
 
> > It is true the attacks were what brought it down, but the amount of effort was not a "sustained
> > attack" by any measure. The invested resources are somewhere around "couple hours and $0.00".
> 
> I'm not sure that's true.

[...]

I think it does not matter.

Professional businesses and their customers can use the mentioned Mailvelope key server,
to protect their keys or use for anonymity purposes Hagrid, in combination with sequoia
pgp, while the geeks can use WKD.

The only thing SKS, so it seems, is currently good for is decentralized file sharing or
for chat purposes, when using SKS chat software.

Regards
Stefan