We shall value email usage
stefan.vasilev at posteo.ru
Thu Apr 1 16:39:16 CEST 2021
Bernhard Reiter wrote:
> Am Mittwoch 31 März 2021 22:28:45 schrieb Stefan Vasilev via Gnupg-users:
>> The more I think about GnuPG with email MUA usage I strongly believe
>> that the Industry has better options than email, especially when it comes
>> to decentralised and confidential communications.
> And what options would that be?
First of all we should consider that GnuPG did not changed the email
world as users may
had expected over the decades and during to continuing mass-surveillance
it is debatable
if a few users should use this communication form further. It would be
good if it would
be accepted by millions when conducting online business but since this
is not the case,
nor never will be, it can be argued when a few people do encrypted email
why not switch to other channels, to reduce the flow of meta data?
An option would be to use UIDless GnuPG key pairs with the Bitmessage
to give GnuPG users additional anonymity. Another method could be IPFS
FileSystem) usage where users distribute encrypted GnuPG payloads and
only provide the
IPFS hashes to communication partners, so that they can read those
hashes, say from
an SMS, a FAX etc. and then download the encrypted payload from places
comfortable with. Another option would be direct FAX/GnuPG usage, with a
which is OCR friendly.
>> Hopefully the Industry will take a look at affordable hardware based
>> encrypted Fax comms for the little individual or small business owner.
> Briefly skimmed the page, it does not say how the maschine-in-the-middle
> (MITM) attack is migitated. Also this hardware solution does not offer the
> means to transport electronic documents, neither would crypto phones.
Correct no electronic documents, but would it be not a bit more
difficult or less common to
intercept DH usage from hardware based devices compared to software
based Internet DH
usage? At least this product exists and it can be assumed that it is
More information about the Gnupg-users