We shall value email usage

Andrew Gallagher andrewg at andrewg.com
Thu Apr 1 16:53:06 CEST 2021

On 01/04/2021 15:39, Stefan Vasilev via Gnupg-users wrote:
> Another option would be direct FAX/GnuPG usage, with a different armor,
> which is OCR friendly.

 From a purely practical point of view, why would anyone in the modern 
world use a system where a digital message is rendered in OCR-able 
format on an analogue raster, to be converted into digital tones, then 
passed down an analogue connection, which is almost certainly carried 
over a VoIP backbone? Please stop.

Andrew Gallagher

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: OpenPGP_signature
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <https://lists.gnupg.org/pipermail/gnupg-users/attachments/20210401/73cf55b1/attachment.sig>

More information about the Gnupg-users mailing list