WKD specifiction: Where to channel reports and suggestions?

Bernhard Reiter bernhard at intevation.de
Fri Jan 29 16:48:49 CET 2021

Am Freitag 29 Januar 2021 01:20:55 schrieb Ángel:
> > I've reported concerns about the draft on https://dev.gnupg.org using
> > the "wkd" tag, though that tag is also used for bug reports, feature
> > requests, etc for the wkd implementation in GnuPG itself:
> >
> >     https://dev.gnupg.org/project/profile/108/

As long as there is no other tag or subtag, `wkd` seems okay to me.
The wiki or this mailinglist both seem to be okay, too.

> > I don't know whether there is a preferred way to report concerns or
> > suggest problems with the spec.  Perhaps Werner can suggest what he
> > prefers?

> During this thread there were a few points that would be very
> appropriate to have filled somewhere, at the very least so that they
> don't get forgotten.

Starting some fresh posts with summaries
(or summaries on dev.gnupg.org) is helpful to me.
I admit that I've lost the overview in the monster thread.

It is hard to spot the arguments in the noise, this is why
I suggest to split and summarize.

Best Regards,

www.intevation.de/~bernhard   +49 541 33 508 3-3
Intevation GmbH, Osnabrück, DE; Amtsgericht Osnabrück, HRB 18998
Geschäftsführer Frank Koormann, Bernhard Reiter, Dr. Jan-Oliver Wagner
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 659 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <https://lists.gnupg.org/pipermail/gnupg-users/attachments/20210129/948109ed/attachment.sig>

More information about the Gnupg-users mailing list