Announced chat control by the EU

[Robert J. Hansen]

> Well, the current US Supreme Court has decided that Section 3 of the
> 14th amendment is unenforceable [1].

[sigh]

No, it has not. If you're going to link to a SCOTUS opinion, please read 
the first page. You say they found Section 3 unenforceable; the first 
page of the opinion says they found Congress to be responsible for 
drafting laws that would enforce Section 3 ("[b]ecause the Constitution 
makes Congress, rather than the States, responsible for enforcing 
Section 3…").

It may be correct to say "SCOTUS erred by not finding Section 3 
self-enforcing." It's completely defensible to say that. (In fact, I 
agree with it!) But please, don't spread lies and disinformation by 
claiming SCOTUS found Section 3 to be *unenforceable*.

All of this is spectacularly off-topic for GnuPG. I am going to opt out 
of all future discussion about law from graduates of YouTube University 
School of Law. If you have a J.D. after your name and want to discuss 
this off-list, my emailbox is open to you.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: OpenPGP_signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 236 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <https://lists.gnupg.org/pipermail/gnupg-users/attachments/20251006/5a6858f0/attachment.sig>