Announced chat control by the EU

[Collin Funk]

"Robert J. Hansen via Gnupg-users" <gnupg-users at gnupg.org> writes:

>> Well, the current US Supreme Court has decided that Section 3 of the
>> 14th amendment is unenforceable [1].
>
> [sigh]
>
> No, it has not. If you're going to link to a SCOTUS opinion, please
> read the first page. You say they found Section 3 unenforceable; the
> first page of the opinion says they found Congress to be responsible
> for drafting laws that would enforce Section 3 ("[b]ecause the
> Constitution makes Congress, rather than the States, responsible for
> enforcing Section 3…").
>
> It may be correct to say "SCOTUS erred by not finding Section 3
> self-enforcing." It's completely defensible to say that. (In fact, I
> agree with it!) But please, don't spread lies and disinformation by
> claiming SCOTUS found Section 3 to be *unenforceable*.

My sincerest apologies for not adding the words "in practice" to my
sentence. You are truly focused on the important things, thank you so
much for correcting me.

Collin

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 832 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.gnupg.org/pipermail/gnupg-users/attachments/20251006/bddd7de7/attachment.sig>