[gnutls-dev] Porting bug fixes to 1.6.x
ludovic.courtes at laas.fr
Tue May 29 14:11:03 CEST 2007
Simon Josefsson <simon at josefsson.org> writes:
> Hi Ludovic. I am sorry these patches didn't make it for 1.6.3, but I
> had to cut the line somewhere, and I felt these hadn't been reviewed
> sufficiently for back-porting yet. We can still make a 1.6.4 soon if
> you want.
Alright, no problem.
> Yes, I think we should push out 1.8.0 (or 2.0.0) within a few weeks or
> so, if we can settle all open issues with it. Perhaps that would be
> sufficient, and you don't need 1.6.x with (only some of) the OpenPGP
> fixes? 1.8 will contain the new OpenCDK 0.6.x and all the fixes.
If 1.8 is so close, then we (at least I) can probably live without
back-porting bug fixes into 1.6. Initially, I thought 1.8 was further
away from now.
> The git repository at repo.or.cz is what I'm using for 1.7.x development
> now, so you could start right now. I don't really know much about git
> though, so when you are done, you'll probably have to tell me what
> commands to invoke, or we'll have to experiment, so I can pull your
> changes from you into my git archive.
So far I just cloned it, so everything is alright. ;-)
I'm a Git beginner as well, so we'll have to be cautious I guess.
> Btw, having the guile bindings be part of 1.8 is a good idea. I think
> it should be a blocking milestone for it. So now my todo-list for 1.8
> * Integrate Guile bindings.
Then I'll start working on it this week (that shouldn't be too much
> * Fix sign callback API to be per-credential rather than per-session.
BTW, will your PCKS#11 work get into 1.8?
More information about the Gnutls-devel