[gnutls-dev] Consider 2.1.6 a release candidate for 2.2!
nmav at gnutls.org
Fri Nov 30 20:57:26 CET 2007
On Friday 30 November 2007, Werner Koch wrote:
> On Thu, 29 Nov 2007 12:25, simon at josefsson.org said:
> > Ah, I see. If we wait for libgcrypt to become stable (which was only a
> > few weeks away if I understand correctly), will it be uploaded into
> Well, you force me to release it sooner than expected. I will do a new
> devel release the next days and ask people to test it on several
> platforms - in particular on VIA to see that I did not broke anything.
> A final release can then be done in ~10 days which would fit your
> release plan I hope.
Maybe we can depend on libgcrypt 1.2.x temporarily. The functionality that we
lose is the DSA2 signing, which is not so critical to be included now.
(I also like the Via stuff and I'll include it at the test?.gnutls.org
More information about the Gnutls-devel