[gnutls-devel] GNUTLS is not going anywhere
wk at gnupg.org
Thu Dec 13 22:09:36 CET 2012
On Thu, 13 Dec 2012 18:52, eliz at gnu.org said:
>> I can't speak for Nikos, but there are pretty obvious reasons knowable
>> to all GNU maintainers.
> I doubt that "obvious" and "knowable to all" are appropriate here,
> since you explain below the relevant discussions were closed.
I wrote "knowable to all GNU maintainers".
> I'm not. Being subscribed there is a privilege, not an obligation.
GNU maintainers are expected to be subscribed to gnu-prog-discuss; well
at least to the read-only gnu-prog list.
> Sorry, but since these were closed discussions, I really cannot say
> anything intelligent about them. I'm surprised that you expect me to
> know their contents somehow.
It is yet another example of the GNU project's management deficit that
not all maintainers are aware of that list.
Die Gedanken sind frei. Ausnahmen regelt ein Bundesgesetz.
More information about the Gnutls-devel